Switch to text mode
 
Republic of the Marshall Islands Biodiversity Clearing House Mechanism
RMI Office of Environmental Planning and Policy Coordination (OEPPC)

banner of the RMI biodiversity CHM website
rounded cornerrounded corner RMI flag
RMI State Emblem
pixel element pixel element
rounded corner rounded corner
pixel element
Community Based Resource Management

What is "Mo"? Traditional Conservation Sites in the Marshall Islands
by Jorelik Tibon

Mixed forests drawing © Nancy Vander Velde

The Marshall Islands is made of islands and atolls scattered and isolated from one another, some of which are as far apart as eight hundred nautical miles. The country has a distinct language and culture unique to these islands. However, there are slight variations, most notably between the two chains of islands. Ralik and Ratak. The traditional system of governance also differs from island to island, even between different "Iroij."

People who have been residing in the Marshall Islands have developed systems whereby they can live in harmony with their environment. As their livelihood depended on resources from the land and sea, the Marshallese developed sustainable methods of harvest of these resources, especially those used for foods. One of these methods (which has survived many generations and even until today is still maintained) was the traditional system to designate certain parts of land, a whole island, or a reef area, as a restricted site. This provided for conservation of food resources such as crabs, fishes and other marine animals used for food. These sites are called "mo," literally meaning a prohibition or a taboo. In other parts of the country, they are referred to as "laroij" denoting a chiefly land ownership.

Where a "mo" was designated, people were not allowed to visit unless the "Iroij" or Paramount Chief had given special permission. Special permission to visit these "mo" would be on specific occasions where there might be a feast, to which the "Iroij" may have the intention of inviting the whole community. On certain occasions, an "Iroij" would have authorized harvesting from a "mo" for special purposes as a last resort. For example during a famine an "Iroij" would have allowed harvesting from the "mo."

To visit one of these "mo," one must observe certain rules which can include going through certain rituals, or be prohibited from saying certain words or even using different names for some of the birds and animals. One is advised that failure to observe these rules could result in a disaster such as a bad storm that might not allow for a safe homeward voyage, or a member of the visiting party could be involved in a tragic accident.

Other rules were meant for the conservation of food resources such as those practiced on Wotje Atoll, where harvesting of coconut crab was limited to certain size and no female crab with eggs was allowed to be taken. Seasonal harvesting for different stock was also a common practice for sustainable use of these resources.

In most cases, it was through these "mo" that biological resources were conserved. Some of these "mo" are still recognized today. Although the degree to which the rules are observed varies, most people still know where the "mo" are and to whom they belong in terms of the traditional land tenure. However, in some cases, where there is a land dispute, it may be difficult to declare or enforce a "mo."

The number-one priority that was expressed in the atoll and national workshops was to reactivate "mo." It was felt that sustainable harvest of the biological resources must be put in place right away so that future generations can inherit and enjoy these resources as well. Traditional food resources both from land and from the sea are being depleted at an alarming rate, especially in the urban centers of Majuro and Ebeye. Discussions at the workshops pointed out that one measure to ensure that resources are not depleted would be to allow them safe areas to regenerate. The "mo" would create these necessary sanctuaries.

The workshops recognized, too that the three governance systems must work together to provide the necessary steps to reactive "mo." The national government can create required legislation to allow for reactivation of "mo," as well as to delineate roles and responsibilities among the three governing systems. The local governments, having immediate jurisdiction over these sites, would need to be involved, especially for the administration of regulations and ordinances. It is equally important to ensure that the "iroij" and "alap," who are the traditional owners and caretakers of "mo," to have the responsibility to ensure that these areas are protected and that traditional rules and controls are maintained, with support from national and local governments.


References:
back to top



menu itemAdvanced search
menu itemHome
menu itemNews
expandible menu itemOverview of local biodiversity
expandible menu itemNational implementation
expanded menu itemNational Initiatives
menu itemEcotourism
you are hereCommunity based resource management
menu itemTraditional knowledge and practices
menu itemEnvironmental education
expandible menu itemPublications
expandible menu itemThreats to Biodiversity
expandible menu itemRMI natural resources database
expandible menu itemMisc. datasets and maps
expandible menu itemPartners and links
menu itemContacts
menu itemFeedback
menu itemCopyright
menu itemAccessibility
menu itemDisclaimer
menu itemPrivacy

What's new

rss feed RSS

03 Nov 2008
New publications available check it!

Read more show more

28 Oct 2008
List of legislative documents has been updated check it!

Read more show more

29 Jul 2008
New feature - RSS feed check it!

Read more show more

31 Mar 2008
Featuring new section - videostreams check it!

Read more show more


rss feed RSS



pixel element
rounded cornerrounded corner
pixel elementpixel element
bulletHOME bullet NEWSbullet OVERVIEW OF LOCAL BIODIVERSITY bullet NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION bullet NATIONAL INITIATIVES:[ Ecotourism ::: you are hereCommunity based resource management ::: Traditional knowledge and practices ::: Environmental education ] bullet PUBLICATIONS bullet THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY bullet RMI NATURAL RESOURCES DATABASE bullet MISC. DATASETS AND MAPSbullet PARTNERS AND LINKS bullet CONTACTS bullet FEEDBACK bullet COPYRIGHT bullet ACCESSIBILITY bullet DISCLAIMER bullet PRIVACY bullet
pixel element
GEF logo and link
pixel element
©RMI Office of Environmental Planning and Policy Coordination (OEPPC)      Last update: 2 October 2008 
pixel element
Documents.rdf.xml | Multimedia.rdf.xml
pixel element
Design & programming by ekoinf.net